next »

Tweet

Please read and post appropriately.

I'm relieved........I thought it might list "eh" as not being a word!

Probably #11  :-)

Always wondered how # 8 worked. 

CC: Bull Run Editorial Staff

As an addendum to number one:  Who's and whose aren't interchangeable.

And yous is not plural for you.  Do yous guys agree?

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

Yippity skippity

Stick that in your grammar pipe and smoke it

[Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply,]

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

It is not so much the quick relies that are the problem.  It is the lengthy tomes that are the problem over and over and over again.

[Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply,]

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

It is not so much the quick relies that are the problem.  It is the lengthy tomes that are the problem over and over and over again.

Ummm?  Don't read them if the grammar displeases you so much, besides no matter what it has to say is going to be wrong anyway.

[Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply,]

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

It is not so much the quick relies that are the problem.  It is the lengthy tomes that are the problem over and over and over again.

So I guess spelling isn't an issue, only grammar.

[Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply,]

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

It is not so much the quick relies that are the problem.  It is the lengthy tomes that are the problem over and over and over again.

So I guess spelling isn't an issue, only grammar.

Well it is a correctly spelled word...

[Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply,]

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

It is not so much the quick relies that are the problem.  It is the lengthy tomes that are the problem over and over and over again.

Dis

[Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply,]

Meh, whatever.  I tend to be pretty strict on grammar, but this is a message board, not the SAT's.  Sometimes when shooting off a quick reply, it is easier to let a simple error pass rather than go back on the tiny screen and fix it. 

If i'm writing a report for work, I try to make sure it's perfect, and I don't tolerate sloppy grammar from people who are paid to produce copy. 

It is not so much the quick relies that are the problem.  It is the lengthy tomes that are the problem over and over and over again.

I'd rather have poor grammar and misspellings in a short meaningful post than a whiny long tome with perfect English.

Grammar = key to communication. Check

Spelling, FWIW = overrated.

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae.  The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.  Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe
 
author, Unknown