OOC schedules are mostly done from a D1 perspective, only Ohio vs Chicago State, and Buffalo vs Michigan State remain for the top six teams. While I could wait to get one more observation for those two teams - I decided to go ahead and analyze now.
Here is a snapshot of normalized margin (i.e subtract 3 points when played at home; add 3 points when played on road) vs rank for the top six teams:
It is a little hard with the above chart to get a perspective, so I did a linear fit by team to get a little more clarity:
You can think of this as a predicted point spread on a neutral court. For example, if Kent were to play a team ranked 100 on a neutral court, my prediction would be they would be favored by 5 points. Kent has clearly performed the best in OOC play. Toledo is a bit of mixed bag, as they had a good win over UAB (#41), but also a couple of bad losses (UMKC and East Carolina) which contributes to a poor fit and very little differentiation of spreads. The fitted line for UB is consistent with most ranking sites which have UB as sixth best in the MAC at this point. I played with the data a little and made JMU and Tulane 8 point losses to get an idea of how much those poor games hurt ranking. With 8 point losses in those games, UB would have been bunched up with Akron, Ball St and Ohio, ranked closer to 140-150.
Finally here is table of some common rankings:
The last row would be the ranking indicated by my crude linear fit. Other than Toledo, it is fairly consistent with the other ranks.
What I would take from all this - is that Kent is the team to beat, Buffalo will need to play better in MAC than they did in 10 D1 OOC games to date, but I think they will be bunched up with Akron, Ball St. and Ohio and seedings for MAC may depend on how they do against those teams.
Finally - my fitted point spread (reminder crude - so I won't be using this to place big wager on game) for the game against Michigan St (~50) would be 19 points.