UB92

NSFW

I am sort of interested to see whether we make progress on defense and in limiting the turnovers. I think we can come in under the number...but lose a 4 or 5 point game. If we get blown out and lose by 15 or so...I think we would be looking at some of those early Reggie single-digit win seasons...

As is well-documented, those who make these lines are really, really good. If they say we are 6.5 point favorites, then I expect a UB victory.

The shattered glass is in the street and has been run over by several cars, causing damage to many tires. Not a large gash, but a slow leak that you won’t know about for a while, unfortunately…

We were outscored second half by a D2 team in a competitive game that could have gone either way in the last minute or so. All of that isn't good. The coach has been tight-lipped, for the most part. Here is what he said after the game. "We just had some lapses where we let them back in, we're going to clean up take care of the ball," stated Head Coach George Halcovage III. "As for the win, first win, it's all about the players. Glad that we were able to stay together and get it done." In some other place I read, he spoke about the physicality of the game and being positive about that (and getting to the line). I am going to try and give him a pass for a while. Basically I'd like to see a better performance, especially on the defensive end, in February as opposed to now. That's what I am looking for.

Ultimately, the MAC is sort of a transition league between FCS and G5…let’s face it. The MAC is the worst FBS conference now. We happen to have some very green coaches who are leaning on the job. It sort of “is what it is” at the moment. We don’t have to get much better to be competitive next year, but I am baffled as to why we are doing what we are doing with the QB play…especially when thinking about the future. I haven’t looked yet, but we have gone back 20 years now in sports…at least the top sports. I was hoping we would never go back…but the sleeping giant that awakening a while back…is asleep again. Probably time to think about new leadership for the athletic department.

This is an interesting take. You have to figure that he has had many conversations with Jay Wright. Wright was the slow-and-steady type in his first head gig (at Hofstra). I don't know enough about Wright's style to have any insights -- maybe someone can dig up something on that. But I think the message of "figure out what you have" in the OOC schedule is probably good advice...at the potential detriment of some losses. Massey is more optomistic than I would have thought...and has UB winning 7 of their next 11 games. https://masseyratings.com/cb2024/979

I don’t want to go too deep here, but UB administration made a conscious decision on where sports fits within the hierarchy of the university. This is evident from the past five or so years. Whatever any administrator says about it, winning isn’t the primary thing. If it was, things would look different. Of course, successes will be lauded and winning is important, but it is not first on the list. UB, as an institution, has different aims. I have only one alma mater and I bleed blue, but that was one tough game to watch. We basically are a training ground for the head coach (and some other staff coaches) to learn on the job. It is what it is. I look forward to the confluence of some good luck and creative thinking from the next AD in the future.

That would be Lafayette College, in Easton, PA. It is the home of Crayola. Lafayette is pretty, pretty, pretty good. They beat Holy Cross and are 7-2 this year. All kidding aside, I suspect we aren’t more than a five point favorite or so for that game next year.

I know this isn’t going to happen, but this is a good time of the year to see what we have in another QB. What have we seen on Gunnar Gray? The backup they used isn’t really a passer. I’d like to see someone other than Snyder at this point. We are not going anywhere, so let’s see what we have

Here is the guy. https://ubbulls.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/dj-mangas/506 Maybe he was creative and cutting edge, but I suspect he is figuring out what to do when he is the guy calling the plays in real time (and not being an analyst of position coach). Of course, he is limited a lot by the offensive line and the limitations of the QB. All a learning experience for him.

This is really it. The OC...he is learning on the job, truly. He makes Kotelnicki look like an offensive mastermind. And people complained vehemently about him. Someone wrote in another post that we look like a HS team. We kind of do. Especially on the special teams.

I think all 11 players on Toledo knew that was going to be a fake.

Pace, a D2 school, beat St. Johns by 4 in an exhibition. Daemen was ranked 8th in D2 last year (East), while Pace was 5th. Considering UB won and St. Johns lost, and the competition level being the same, I am confident that UB will be among the favorites in the MAC (and the Mid-Majors, in general). --- I am joking...I just wanted to get here before someone else posted this...but was more serious!

I am gonna guess that Kaulig has put money towards this as well. He was a former Zip QB so the sport connection is deep. As we all know, it is much easier to make an impact in basketball since there are fewer players. Also, unlike football, Akron basketball isn’t a joke. I know the UB Development Division had their best year ever last year, but I don’t think they are as focused on NIL or athletic collectives as they are with other items. We need some very successful UB alumni who have a lot of money (from business) AND a strong connection with athletics.

Hopefully there were a lot of recruits and donors at the game.

UB had a couple of poorly timed penalities -- one took points off the board. Akron isn't very good on offense, but UB was little better. It was a game we could have easily lost, but found a way. Early in the 4th quarter I turned to my father and said "this is going to overtime" and he agreed. There are some poor MAC teams this year and they are inconsistent. I mean, on paper it would seem that CMU is better than UB. They beat a reasonable USA team on the road and had some success versus the Irish. But they were all out to beat EMU as 10 point home favorites. They come into UB Stadium as 3 point road favorites and, to me, this game can be anything. Anything from a 42 - 10 Buffalo win to a 42 - 10 Buffalo loss are in play -- and anything in between. Snyder is certainly not "the guy", but he now has experience and that has value. Go Bulls. Let's make it two-in-a-row this Saturday.

There’s a lot of hatred in this post…certainly very tangential to the actual game.

I've seen it at 3 points in some places. The weather looks pretty good. It may be a high-scoring, entertaining game. Lots of big plays.

I know...I read his bio before. But I strongly expect that you can find a similar bio for other G5 coaches in their first season as a DC with a defense that was predicted to be okay not be, basically, last in D1. Do you have any specifics? Do others have specifics on why we have performed so bad that can be laid specifically on this DC? Note that I am not a DC apologist (obviously), but am trying to figure out why we are so porous on defensive when there was much optimism on this side of the ball prior to the start of the year.

Game preview. https://www.hustlebelt.com/2023/9/20/23880151/2023-week-4-preview-buffalo-bulls-louisiana-ragin-cajuns-mac-sun-belt-sep-23-cole-snyder-zeon-chriss The running QB thing...yeesh. My guess is UB plays spy on the QB, sells out to stop the run and then we see how the DBs hold up in coverage. Could be a lot of big plays. Need to counter some of those big plays we give up with a pick 6 (or two!) Go Bulls

Can you speak to this point I have bolded a bit more? What do you see (beyond the obvious points, yards, etc.) that point to him being over his head?

Isn't this the week we turn it around...on our way to a 9-3 season? Only takes one week to turn it around. This is it! Go Bulls!

This is what coach said earlier in the week about the Fordham game: “Although we lost, there’s a ton of areas that we’re playing at a high level, but we’ve got to continue to raise the level of play, all across the board." I wrote in a post that “Basically, the coach is blaming execution and knowing what you are supposed to do.” —- I think he (and his staff) believe we have the talent, but the execution is not there. I suspect there will be comments about that this week as well. I guess, however, you can’t keep blaming execution because eventually people will blame the teacher! Maybe we don’t have the talent he believes we have or maybe it is execution…or maybe both. But the bottom line is that we can’t really run block like we have in the past, get little push on defense and seem out of position on many occasions in the defensive backfield. —- I am not sure how good Louisiana is, but that will be tough on the road regardless. We are likely to be 0-4 going to Akron to start the conference portion of the schedule. At least we can score points through the air. That will keep up in games against teams that have bad offenses.

Bottom 10 3. Buffalo Bulls Not Bills (0-2) An opening loss to Wisconsin on the road, that's not bad. But a loss at home to FCS Fordham in which the Rams quarterback throws five touchdown passes, that's very bad. Fordham had already lost this season to the Albany Great Danes, who lost to Marshall and Hawai'i and were picked 11th in the 15-team Colonial Athletic Association's preseason poll. Heads up, Arkansas State, Stony Brook was picked 14th. https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/38386626/college-football-bottom-10-week-2-alabama ****** Not a great look to already be at #3. I thought these days were over. Alas, they are not. UB looked competitive in their game against Wisconsin and jumped out to a 21-3 lead against Fordham, but then let this FCS team go up and down the field on them (obviously already thinking they had won). Like last year. This is (almost) all on coaching and is an indictment of the HC. After all, this was the year we were taking the next step. Experienced QB, some experienced line players, potential draft picks among the starters, etc. The team was picked third in the MAC East and one MAC coach had them winning the MACC. Losing to Fordham (when you are 23.5 point favorites) has many negative repercussions, not the least of which are the recruits that came to the game (expecting, I assume, to see a strong performance). *** A few days after the game, this is the coach's comments: “Although we lost, there’s a ton of areas that we’re playing at a high level, but we’ve got to continue to raise the level of play, all across the board." Basically, the coach is blaming execution and knowing what you are supposed to do. The fumble on the punt...Cook put it on himself. At any rate, I would think it is unlikely that all of these things "get fixed" in one week, especially with a few injuries and Grant out for the first half. *** My guess is that Liberty underestimates UB a bit and, like against Coastal last year, UB is in the game for a good chunk...but eventually succombs to Liberty's offense (and makes secondary mistakes, bad penalties and/or bad decisions). I hope I am wrong and UB dominates. I forgot that Liberty's coach makes about 6x as much in compensation as the UB coach.