3 years seems fair, agreed. That being said it stresses me out that I don't see a lot of reason to feel that we're headed in the right direction with what is turning out to be a "rebuild". We had issues with depth this year and have a ton of [key] players headed out next year and question marks at some key positions for 21-22. This is going to be a huge lift on the recruiting front just to maintain stability let alone build toward future conference championships (yes, I believe that in the MAC this is the only acceptable goal).
I don't know that I've seen it? We seems to see the same issues with in-game performance: turnovers, scoring droughts, FT shooting, offensive flow, clock management, half time adjustments. I get that there are ways to chart efficiencies that look advantageous but it has to lead to winning against decent or better teams for it to matter.