121Merrimac

I feel sad for those who don’t understand the context of entertainment. It has nothing to do with acceptance.

Curtis' 67th three? Where will he finish... just short of 100, I think. 90ish? Edit: Jeremy Harris currently holds 5th place all time, with 92.

Sure, I understand seniors need to be replaced, but still…

This year’s problem: no post players. Next year’s solution: recruit more guards?

The mathematician beat the odds. Good for him, lol !

Take control of the 8th seed made me laugh.

66.6% of them, yeah

Every team in the conference beside UB still has listed recruits that 247 hasn’t graded yet. I’d expect the overall class ranking to change again before it’s all said and done.

I’m not sure where the boundaries are, but todays matchup of Akron and Ohio should be good, and help define them.

I’d bet a mortgage payment that it was not.

Fwiw, I was quoting the school’s article, and not making a comparison of my own. Additionally, I feel that because of the connection to the head coach, Wes felt closer to a homegrown Bull than any other transfer ever will.

21 assists in 3 games? You know, like, Wes Clark.

This doesn’t fit the 3 of next 4 narrative. I’ll stick with 3/4

This is a good grounding anchor point, thanks!

I understood the question to be more along the lines of; why not develop the future, by playing some of the younger members a little more.

I really hope so too, since he is in a position that can influence the outcome. I can’t, so personally I don’t see the point in adding to the discussion. shrugs

Apparently "tiebreaker" wasn't the best language. UB loses to CMU. UB thrashes BG. BG crushes CMU. Still scratching my head.

Who wins the BG, CMU, UB tiebreaker? Head scratcher

sorry, my bad... almost deleted before submitting. next time I'll make the right choice

'05 Bobcats say; not quite

I'll bet a mortgage payment that we all want a better coach. Some just realize the budget constraints, and don't both bother daydreaming of things out of their control.

Wouldn't surprise me if the 2nd half was called much differently. MACtion!?

Under 20 again. How close would bring hope?

Winning 3 of the next 4 (best 4 in the MAC) sounds good to me.

I liked Nate’s mathematics background. (Take short 3s, not long 2s) And, I liked Felisha’s psychology background. (You can do it, attitude) Mimic one of these, please.