Jump to content
Buffalo Bulls - UB Fan Forum

Ranking every college basketball team


Recommended Posts

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/ranking-every-college-basketball-team-from-no-1-to-353-for-2019-20-and-an-interesting-fact-on-every-team/

154. Buffalo: The most dominant season in program history -- by far; the Bulls were 32-4 last season! -- will lead to a huge comedown as Jim Whitesell takes over for outgoing Nate Oats. Buffalo still has some dudes, but winning the MAC will be a tussle.

 

Top-100 teams on the schedule: #39 Harvard, #54 UConn, #87 DePaul, #88 St. Bonaventure, #93 Toledo

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, dutchcountry7 said:

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/ranking-every-college-basketball-team-from-no-1-to-353-for-2019-20-and-an-interesting-fact-on-every-team/

154. Buffalo: The most dominant season in program history -- by far; the Bulls were 32-4 last season! -- will lead to a huge comedown as Jim Whitesell takes over for outgoing Nate Oats. Buffalo still has some dudes, but winning the MAC will be a tussle.

 

Top-100 teams on the schedule: #39 Harvard, #54 UConn, #87 DePaul, #88 St. Bonaventure, #93 Toledo

 

So I have seen everything form #29 - Massey.com to #175 on Barttovik.com.  With the turnover on this team there is a lot of uncertainty as to how they will perform.  I expect that a drop off in offense from 84.4 ppg last year to around 77-78.  I expect the defense to be as tough as last year - giving up 71-72 ppg.  My basic model suggests this means winning 60%-65% of games (~19 /20 wins).  I am inclined to go along with Kenpom.com at #93 and collegesportsmadness.com at #109.  This equates to UB being one of the top 3 teams in the MAC, with a definite shot at winning the MAC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, DocCas86 said:

So I have seen everything form #29 - Massey.com to #175 on Barttovik.com.  With the turnover on this team there is a lot of uncertainty as to how they will perform.  I expect that a drop off in offense from 84.4 ppg last year to around 77-78.  I expect the defense to be as tough as last year - giving up 71-72 ppg.  My basic model suggests this means winning 60%-65% of games (~19 /20 wins).  I am inclined to go along with Kenpom.com at #93 and collegesportsmadness.com at #109.  This equates to UB being one of the top 3 teams in the MAC, with a definite shot at winning the MAC.

Buffalo has some room to regress and still have success...they were that much better than most teams they played last year (as you would expect from a Top 25 program that they were).   So I tend to agree with you in that they will lose some scoring.  I am curious to see how the defense looks.  If they lose some on offense, but gain a similar amount on defense, shouldn't they have a strong year again (says the optimist!)

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, UB92 said:

Buffalo has some room to regress and still have success...they were that much better than most teams they played last year (as you would expect from a Top 25 program that they were).   So I tend to agree with you in that they will lose some scoring.  I am curious to see how the defense looks.  If they lose some on offense, but gain a similar amount on defense, shouldn't they have a strong year again (says the optimist!)

 

 

I would love it if my assumptions are not optimistic enough.  My very simplistic model predicts winning percent based on point per game differential (score more than your opponent and you win - so easy even I could figure that out!).    If UB improves defensively to produce a differential of 8-10 points per game, then the winning percentage would be closer to 70-75%.  Based on 31 regular season games would be ~21/22 wins.  FWIW, when UB had a 70%-75% winning percentage, ranking was in 50 to 60 range.  Finally, as a reasonableness test, last year UB scored 13.6 ppg more than their opponents.  This would correspond to a predicted 85% winning percentage compared to actual win percentage of 89%.  Here is the data I looked at:

image.png.045ed2e07dfdba60b8c25dd72343356b.png

Edited by DocCas86
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, dutchcountry7 said:

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/ranking-every-college-basketball-team-from-no-1-to-353-for-2019-20-and-an-interesting-fact-on-every-team/

154. Buffalo: The most dominant season in program history -- by far; the Bulls were 32-4 last season! -- will lead to a huge comedown as Jim Whitesell takes over for outgoing Nate Oats. Buffalo still has some dudes, but winning the MAC will be a tussle.

 

Top-100 teams on the schedule: #39 Harvard, #54 UConn, #87 DePaul, #88 St. Bonaventure, #93 Toledo

 

This ranking is a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, mikescherrer8 said:

I just, don’t understand how the Bonnies are so high. I don’t care that they play in the A-10, but their current roster doesn’t dictate that ranking. They are not great on paper.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Aren't they less experienced than we are?  We have seasoned D1 guys and they have like no upper classmen...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, mikescherrer8 said:

I just, don’t understand how the Bonnies are so high. I don’t care that they play in the A-10, but their current roster doesn’t dictate that ranking. They are not great on paper.

Bonaventure has some great young talent on their roster. Lofton is going to be a fixture on the A10 all conference teams and Osunniyi, Planiutis and Welch should develop nicely. I have no issue with their ranking. 

I definitely take issue being behind Kent State, Ball State, Central Michigan (are you kidding me?) and Toledo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2019 at 12:55 PM, mikescherrer8 said:

I just, don’t understand how the Bonnies are so high. I don’t care that they play in the A-10, but their current roster doesn’t dictate that ranking. They are not great on paper.

Mike there are 153 teams rated ahead of UB and you only are worried about the Bonnies!  You do care! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 961819 said:

Also I’d like to quickly point out someone who may not stick out much on the stat sheets this season but Savion is going to be a hell of a player down the line for us. He’s always giving 100% every play 

I think you were also pretty accurate regarding Brock's value.

Your board participation rating might say "four year starter", but sometimes your insight feels more like team manager.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 121Merrimac said:

I think you were also pretty accurate regarding Brock's value.

Your board participation rating might say "four year starter", but sometimes your insight feels more like team manager.

I appreciate that! It’ll be interesting to see if Brock still gets the start once Hardnett comes back. My guess is the center position will be largely situational depending on what the other team’s center situation is. Like when we play Miami OH we’ll probably start Brock since Miami has Bam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...